Page 25 of 27

IM22.1-13 | Poisoning — Graded Quiz

Graded 11 questions · Untimed · 2 attempts

Click any question card to reveal the correct answer.

Q1 IM22.6 1 pt

A 24-year-old farm worker is brought by ambulance 30 minutes after collapsing in a paddy field. Paramedics note excessive oral secretions and miosis. On arrival, GCS is 7, BP 90/60 mmHg, heart rate 52/min, SpO2 78% on room air. After securing the airway and administering high-flow oxygen, which drug combination represents the MOST appropriate next step?

A Atropine 0.6 mg IV + pralidoxime 1 g IV over 15 minutes
B Atropine 1.8–3 mg IV bolus (titrate to dry secretions) + pralidoxime 1–2 g IV as soon as possible
C Pralidoxime 1 g IV alone (atropine only after SpO2 improves)
D Naloxone 0.4 mg IV + atropine 0.6 mg IV
E Diazepam 10 mg IV to control fasciculations before antidote therapy

Correct. This is severe OP poisoning. After airway/O2, both antidotes are given concurrently. Atropine: start at 1.8-3 mg IV (NOT 0.6 mg — that is under-dosing) and double the dose every 5-10 minutes until secretions dry. The target is DRY SECRETIONS (clear chest), not tachycardia or mydriasis. Pralidoxime reactivates AChE before ageing occurs (within the first 24-48 hours for most OPs) and is most effective when given early. Naloxone does not treat cholinergic toxidrome. Benzodiazepines may be used for seizures but are not first-line.

Severe OP poisoning requires aggressive atropinisation — starting at 1.8-3 mg IV and titrating to dry secretions, NOT the 0.6 mg dose that is routinely under-used. Pralidoxime should be started simultaneously. Delay in atropine from waiting for SpO2 improvement is dangerous — atropine dries the bronchorrhoea that is causing the hypoxia.

Click to reveal answer

Q2 IM22.4 1 pt

A 26-year-old woman ingested 15 g of paracetamol 3 hours ago. A serum paracetamol level is done and plotted on the Rumack-Matthew nomogram — it falls ABOVE the treatment line. She is currently asymptomatic with a normal liver profile. She asks: 'I feel fine — why do I need treatment?' Which explanation is MOST accurate?

A NAC treats the liver injury she already has, which is not yet detectable by standard blood tests
B The nomogram predicts hepatotoxicity risk based on NAPQI generation rate — NAC provides glutathione substrate to prevent hepatocyte necrosis before it occurs; symptoms appear only at 24-96 hours
C NAC is given prophylactically to prevent renal failure, which is the main risk in paracetamol overdose
D NAC is only needed if transaminases rise above 1000 U/L; the nomogram is only a guide
E NAC reverses the paracetamol that has already been absorbed by chelating it in the bloodstream

Correct. Paracetamol is metabolised via CYP2E1 to NAPQI; in overdose, glutathione stores are depleted and NAPQI covalently binds hepatocyte proteins — causing centrilobular necrosis. This process is time-dependent and clinically silent for 24 hours. NAC provides cysteine substrate to replenish glutathione, detoxifying NAPQI BEFORE necrosis is established. The Rumack-Matthew nomogram predicts which patients will develop hepatotoxicity — patients above the treatment line must receive NAC whether or not they have symptoms. Waiting for transaminase rise means waiting until the preventable window has closed.

NAC works by replenishing glutathione to neutralise NAPQI before it causes hepatocyte necrosis. The damage is biochemically progressing while the patient is symptom-free. The nomogram identifies those at risk — treatment before injury is the entire logic of NAC therapy. Starting NAC after transaminase rise means the preventable window has passed.

Click to reveal answer

Q3 IM22.8 1 pt

A 30-year-old man is admitted with methanol poisoning confirmed by history (ingested illicit liquor 12 hours ago). He is now anuric and has pH 7.08, bicarbonate 6 mmol/L, anion gap 32 mmol/L. Fomepizole is not available in the pharmacy. Which is the MOST appropriate next step?

A Start folic acid 50 mg IV 6-hourly and observe for recovery
B Administer ethanol via nasogastric tube to achieve serum ethanol level of 100-150 mg/dL, plus arrange urgent haemodialysis
C Sodium bicarbonate infusion is sufficient to correct the acidosis and prevent optic nerve damage
D Flumazenil to reverse CNS depression from methanol
E N-acetylcysteine infusion as in paracetamol overdose, since oxidative stress is the final pathway

Correct. When fomepizole is unavailable, ethanol is the alternative ADH inhibitor — ethanol has higher affinity for ADH than methanol, competitively preventing methanol's conversion to formaldehyde and formate. Oral/NG ethanol is used to achieve a serum level of 100-150 mg/dL. However, with pH 7.08, severe acidosis, anuria, and likely high methanol/formate levels, haemodialysis is also mandatory — it removes both methanol and formate, corrects acidosis, and treats acute kidney injury. Folic acid accelerates formate breakdown but is an adjunct, not primary therapy. NAC is not indicated for methanol.

When fomepizole is unavailable, ethanol (nasogastric or IV) is the alternative ADH inhibitor, titrated to a serum level of 100-150 mg/dL. In severe poisoning with pH <7.25, anuria, or visual symptoms, haemodialysis is mandatory to remove methanol and formate. Bicarbonate alone does not remove the toxin.

Click to reveal answer

Q4 IM22.7 1 pt

A 45-year-old man is found unconscious at home. He has a heart rate of 38/min, BP 70/40 mmHg, and cold clammy skin. Empty blisters of aluminium phosphide (Celphos) tablets are found nearby. After basic resuscitation, a family member demands aggressive intervention. The intern starts inserting a nasogastric tube for activated charcoal. What should the senior physician do?

A Allow the NG tube insertion but give coconut oil instead of activated charcoal
B Stop the NG tube insertion — activated charcoal is ineffective for phosphide and NG tube stimulates vomiting, releasing toxic phosphine gas in the room
C Proceed with activated charcoal and add magnesium sulphate as a cathartic
D Give atropine 3 mg IV as an antidote first, then proceed with NG tube
E Urgent gastric lavage to remove any remaining tablet fragments

Correct. Aluminium phosphide management requires knowing what NOT to do. Activated charcoal does not adsorb phosphine gas. NG tube insertion triggers vomiting, and phosphine gas in vomitus can be inhaled by healthcare workers in the room — a real occupational hazard. Gastric lavage is dangerous (volatilises more gas) and ineffective once phosphine has been absorbed. Atropine is not the antidote — there is no antidote. Supportive care with vasopressors (noradrenaline/adrenaline for cardiovascular collapse), magnesium sulphate (as an adjuvant for its antioxidant effect, not as a cathartic), and intensive monitoring is the only option.

In AlP poisoning: no NG tube (phosphine in vomitus is a healthcare worker hazard), no activated charcoal (ineffective), no gastric lavage (dangerous). There is no antidote. Management is supportive — vasopressors for cardiovascular collapse, arrhythmia management. The family should be counselled honestly about the grave prognosis.

Click to reveal answer

Q5 IM22.6 1 pt

Twelve days after apparent recovery from severe organophosphate poisoning requiring ICU admission, a 40-year-old farmer develops proximal limb weakness, neck flexion weakness, and is found to have absent deep tendon reflexes. His cholinergic symptoms have resolved. What is the MOST likely diagnosis?

A Guillain-Barre Syndrome triggered by the critical illness
B Intermediate syndrome — a delayed complication of OP poisoning at 24 hours to 18 days after the acute cholinergic crisis
C Re-ingestion of organophosphate causing a second cholinergic crisis
D Organophosphate-induced delayed polyneuropathy (OPIDP), which presents within 48 hours
E Hypokalaemic periodic paralysis from prolonged ICU stay

Correct. Intermediate syndrome (IMS) is a well-recognised delayed complication of OP poisoning occurring 24 hours to 18 days after the acute cholinergic crisis (typically days 1-4 of apparent recovery). It is characterised by: proximal limb weakness, neck flexion weakness (cranial nerve involvement), and potentially respiratory failure requiring re-intubation. It is NOT a recurrence of the cholinergic toxidrome. The mechanism is incompletely understood but relates to prolonged AChE inhibition at the neuromuscular junction. OPIDP occurs weeks to months later (delayed neuropathy). GBS can mimic IMS but context here is clear.

Intermediate syndrome is the specific OP complication presenting 1-18 days after the acute crisis — proximal weakness, neck flexion weakness, and respiratory compromise. It is not a recurrence of cholinergic features. OPIDP is a separate, later complication (weeks-months) causing sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. ICU patients may develop GBS but the OP poisoning context makes IMS the primary diagnosis.

Click to reveal answer

Q6 IM22.2 1 pt

A 55-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department after reportedly ingesting Nerium oleander leaves. She is bradycardic (HR 38/min), hypotensive, and the ECG shows third-degree heart block. Her daughter states she was treated for a heart condition. What is the MOST likely mechanism of her cardiac toxicity?

A Oleandrin inhibits beta-1 adrenergic receptors, causing bradycardia
B Cardiac glycoside toxicity — oleandrin inhibits Na+/K+-ATPase, causing intracellular calcium overload, bradycardia, and AV block
C Oleandrin is an anticholinergic that paradoxically slows the heart through central vagal activation
D Direct myocardial toxicity from cyanogenic glycosides released on metabolism of oleandrin
E Hyperkalemia-induced conduction block from renal failure caused by the plant toxin

Correct. Nerium oleander contains oleandrin and neriine — cardiac glycosides that inhibit the Na+/K+-ATPase pump. This leads to intracellular sodium accumulation → Na+/Ca2+ exchanger reversal → intracellular calcium overload → increased automaticity and impaired conduction. The result is virtually identical to digoxin toxicity: bradycardia, AV block, ventricular arrhythmias, and hyperkalaemia. In India, Cerbera manghas (sea mango), Thevetia peruviana (yellow oleander), and Nerium oleander are the major cardiac glycoside plant poisons. Management: digoxin-specific antibody fragments (Fab) can cross-react with plant cardiac glycosides in severe cases; otherwise supportive.

Oleandrin is a cardiac glycoside that inhibits Na+/K+-ATPase — the same mechanism as digoxin. The consequence is intracellular calcium overload causing bradyarrhythmias, AV block, and ventricular arrhythmias. This is NOT beta-blockade or anticholinergic toxicity. Digoxin-specific Fab fragments have been used in severe cases.

Click to reveal answer

Q7 IM22.11 1 pt

A final-year student is called to help complete the medico-legal report (MLR) for a 19-year-old student brought in after alleged organophosphate ingestion. The patient is now stable. Which of the following must the MLR include?

A The physician's personal opinion on whether the patient intended self-harm
B Patient's MLC number, date and time of examination, clinical findings, investigation results, treatment given, and the nature and extent of injuries — without conclusion on suicidal or homicidal intent
C The patient's psychiatric diagnosis, which must be completed before the MLR is finalised
D A statement confirming whether the patient's account of accidental poisoning is believed
E The exact amount of poison ingested, which should be estimated and recorded even if unknown

Correct. The medico-legal report for poisoning is a factual clinical document. It must include: MLC registration number, date/time of examination, history as given (noting who gave it), clinical findings (level of consciousness, vital signs, specific examination findings), investigations ordered and results, treatment given. Crucially, the physician must NOT opine on suicidal vs homicidal intent — that determination is for the magistrate/court. Unknown quantities should be recorded as 'not known' rather than estimated. Psychiatric diagnosis, while important for management, is a separate clinical document.

The MLR is a factual record, not an opinion document. Record clinical findings, investigations, and treatment. Do NOT opine on suicidal vs homicidal intent — that is for the court. Do NOT estimate unknown quantities. A psychiatric diagnosis is a clinical concern, not an MLR requirement.

Click to reveal answer

Q8 IM22.8 1 pt

A 60-year-old man ingested ethylene glycol (antifreeze) 6 hours ago. His serum shows high osmolar gap, pH 7.18, and urine microscopy reveals calcium oxalate crystals. He is oliguric. What is the MOST serious target organ concern at this stage, and which treatment is most urgently needed?

A Optic nerve toxicity; give folic acid to accelerate oxalate metabolism
B Acute kidney injury from calcium oxalate crystal deposition; block ADH with fomepizole and arrange urgent haemodialysis
C Cardiac arrhythmias from hypocalcaemia; treat with IV calcium gluconate alone
D Basal ganglia toxicity; activated charcoal to prevent further absorption
E Renal toxicity can be corrected by forced diuresis with IV fluids alone

Correct. Ethylene glycol is metabolised to glycolic acid and then to oxalic acid (oxalate) via ADH. Oxalate precipitates with calcium in renal tubules as calcium oxalate crystals → acute tubular necrosis and AKI. Optic nerve toxicity and basal ganglia damage are features of methanol (formate), NOT ethylene glycol. Treatment: (1) Fomepizole blocks ADH — stops further oxalate generation; (2) Thiamine and pyridoxine as adjuvants to divert glyoxylate away from oxalate; (3) Haemodialysis is mandatory in AKI, metabolic acidosis pH <7.25, or high ethylene glycol levels. IV calcium may be needed for symptomatic hypocalcaemia but does not treat the primary toxicity.

Ethylene glycol's toxic metabolite is oxalate (not formate — that is methanol). Oxalate crystallises in renal tubules causing AKI. The hallmarks: calcium oxalate crystals in urine, oliguric AKI, high osmolar gap then high anion gap as metabolism proceeds. Fomepizole blocks further oxalate production; haemodialysis treats AKI and removes the toxin.

Click to reveal answer

Q9 IM22.3 1 pt

A house officer working in a tertiary care emergency department receives a call about a 4-year-old child who accidentally swallowed a small amount of toilet bowl cleaner (hydrochloric acid). The parents are 40 km away. Which is the MOST appropriate first instruction to give them over the phone?

A Give the child milk to neutralise the acid before travelling to hospital
B Induce vomiting using the finger-touch method to remove the acid immediately
C Do NOT induce vomiting; wipe around the mouth with a clean cloth; give small sips of water only if fully conscious, then bring the child immediately to the nearest emergency department
D Activate charcoal solution from the home first-aid kit before travelling
E Pass a finger into the throat to clear any remaining liquid

Correct. Remote telephone advice for corrosive ingestion: NEVER induce vomiting (re-exposes burned mucosa, risk of airway obstruction), NEVER give milk or attempt neutralisation, NEVER pass anything into the throat. Wipe around the mouth. If the child is fully alert and there is no stridor, small sips of water to dilute may be acceptable per some guidelines. The priority is immediate transfer to the nearest emergency facility with resuscitation capability for airway assessment and endoscopy planning. Contacting the National Poison Centre (1800-116-117) for additional guidance is appropriate.

Corrosive poisoning: the only emergency first-aid instruction is DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING. Everything else — milk, charcoal, finger in throat — is either useless or harmful. Wipe the mouth, do not give anything unless the child is fully conscious and you are advised by a poison centre, and seek emergency care immediately.

Click to reveal answer

Q10 IM22.13 1 pt

A 25-year-old who took a paracetamol overdose in the context of a deliberate self-harm episode is now medically stable after completing NAC. She denies ongoing suicidal ideation but seems distressed. Which is the MOST appropriate next step in her management before discharge?

A Discharge her with outpatient follow-up since she denies suicidal ideation
B Compulsory psychiatric certification before any further decisions
C Mandatory psychiatric consultation to assess suicidal risk, contributing factors, and formulate a safety plan before any discharge decision
D Discharge as soon as liver function tests normalise, since psychiatric follow-up is optional
E Refer to social work but no psychiatric review is needed since she is medically cleared

Correct. Every deliberate self-harm (DSH) case — irrespective of current suicidal ideation — requires mandatory psychiatric consultation before discharge. The treating physician must not assess suicidal risk independently. The psychiatric team will assess: intent, access to means, protective factors, mental illness, and social context; formulate a safety plan; and determine the appropriate level of care (inpatient psychiatric admission vs outpatient follow-up). Denial of current suicidal ideation in the immediate aftermath is unreliable and does not reduce the risk. The absence of suicidal ideation on the day of discharge does not eliminate risk.

All deliberate self-harm admissions require psychiatric consultation before discharge — this is mandatory, not optional. The denial of current ideation in the immediate post-medical period is unreliable. The psychiatrist assesses risk, mental illness, safety plan, and disposition. Discharging a DSH patient without psychiatric clearance is a clinical and medico-legal risk.

Click to reveal answer

Q11 IM22.12 1 pt

When managing the family of a 55-year-old man admitted with severe aluminium phosphide poisoning, which is the MOST appropriate communication approach?

A Avoid discussing prognosis until the patient either improves or dies, to prevent false hope or unnecessary distress
B Tell the family the exact percentage survival probability based on published data without emotional support
C Provide honest, empathic communication about the grave prognosis while simultaneously explaining what the team is doing; acknowledge the absence of antidote and the limits of supportive care; invite questions
D Request police presence during the family meeting as the case is an MLC
E Discuss prognosis only with the eldest male family member to preserve cultural norms

Correct. Family counselling in aluminium phosphide poisoning is one of the most difficult conversations in emergency medicine. The key principles are: honesty (the prognosis is genuinely grave — case fatality can exceed 60-90% in severe poisoning), empathy (acknowledge distress), transparency about the limits of medicine (no antidote), and explaining active supportive measures the team is taking. Withholding prognostic information denies families the ability to prepare. Quoting statistics without emotional support is harmful. Restricting information to one family member by gender is inconsistent with patient-centred care. Police involvement is appropriate for MLC registration, not family counselling.

Family counselling in grave poisoning requires honest prognostic disclosure combined with empathy and support. Withholding the prognosis denies informed decision-making. Quoting statistics without support is cold and unhelpful. The goal is honest, kind communication that explains what is being done and allows the family to prepare.

Click to reveal answer