Page 9 of 11
SU7.1-2,SU8.1-3 | Ethics, Audit and Research — Graded Quiz
Click any question card to reveal the correct answer.
A surgeon, running late, enters the pre-operative area and finds an anxious patient who has not had the operation explained. The surgeon sits down, makes eye contact, acknowledges the patient's fear, explains the procedure in plain language and answers questions before seeking consent. Which professional behaviour is the surgeon principally demonstrating?
Correct. Acknowledging the patient's emotional state and communicating in plain, respectful language before seeking consent is empathic, patient-centred professionalism.
Professionalism in surgery includes empathy and clear, patient-centred communication, not just technical skill; a technically perfect operation can still wrong a patient if these are absent.
Pausing to acknowledge fear and explain the operation in plain language is empathic, patient-centred communication — a core element of surgical professionalism.
Click to reveal answer
A hospital has one intensive-care bed and two equally sick post-operative patients who both need it. The team decides allocation using transparent, clinically defensible criteria applied equally to both patients rather than by ability to pay. Which ethical principle most directly governs this decision?
Correct. The fair distribution of a scarce resource using consistent, defensible criteria applied equally is the principle of justice (distributive justice).
Justice concerns the fair distribution of benefits, risks and scarce resources; allocation should rest on transparent, defensible clinical criteria applied equally.
Allocating a scarce resource fairly and consistently — not by ability to pay — is governed by the principle of justice (distributive justice).
Click to reveal answer
A patient suffers a known, properly disclosed and consented complication after an operation performed competently to the accepted standard of care. The patient sues, claiming negligence. On these facts, why is a negligence claim unlikely to succeed?
Correct. Negligence requires a breach of the standard of care that caused harm. A recognised complication, properly disclosed and consented to, occurring despite care that met the standard, is not a breach of duty.
A poor outcome is not the same as negligence; negligence requires duty, breach of the standard of care (Bolam/Bolitho) and causation. Valid consent to a recognised complication is a key defence.
Negligence needs a breach of the standard of care causing harm. A known, consented complication occurring despite competent care that met the standard is not in itself a breach of duty.
Click to reveal answer
An aggrieved patient wishes to pursue a complaint of deficient surgical service through a forum specifically designed to be quicker and less formal than civil courts, alleging deficiency in service. Under which Indian statutory framework is this consumer-protection route principally available?
Correct. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 provides consumer fora for grievances alleging deficiency in service, which can include medical/surgical services, offering a quicker, less formal route than civil litigation.
The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 allows patients to seek redress for deficiency in medical service through consumer fora; surgeons must understand this medico-legal exposure.
Grievances alleging deficiency in medical service are pursued through consumer fora under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — the framework designed for quicker, less formal redress than the civil courts.
Click to reveal answer
A surgical team completes an audit, finds practice below the agreed standard, introduces a checklist, and then stops. A reviewer says the audit is incomplete. Which step is missing that defines a complete audit cycle?
Correct. The audit cycle must close the loop: set standard → measure practice → compare → implement change → RE-AUDIT. Without re-measuring after the change, the cycle is incomplete and improvement is unproven.
The audit cycle: set the standard and criteria → measure current practice → compare → implement change → RE-AUDIT. Skipping the re-audit leaves the loop open.
An audit is only complete when the loop is closed by re-auditing after the change, to confirm practice has improved against the standard. The missing step here is the re-audit.
Click to reveal answer
In a randomised trial comparing two suture materials for wound infection, the investigators report that the difference in infection rates reached a p-value of 0.03. Using the conventional threshold, how should this result be interpreted?
Correct. By the conventional threshold of p<0.05, a p-value of 0.03 is statistically significant: the observed difference is unlikely to be due to chance alone under the null hypothesis.
p<0.05 is the conventional threshold for statistical significance; a smaller p means the observed result is less likely under the null hypothesis, but significance is not the same as clinical importance or proof.
The conventional significance threshold is p<0.05. A p-value of 0.03 is below this, so the result is statistically significant — the difference is unlikely to be due to chance alone.
Click to reveal answer