Page 28 of 30

OG8.1-10 | Antenatal Care — Graded Quiz

Graded 12 questions · Untimed · 2 attempts

Click any question card to reveal the correct answer.

Q1 OG8.1 1 pt

A 26-year-old primigravida at 14 weeks is identified at her first ANC visit as having a body mass index of 38 kg/m2, a blood pressure of 118/74 mmHg, and no other medical history. According to the risk-stratification principle of the 'inverted pyramid of care', which of the following best describes the appropriate management pathway?

A She is low-risk; follow the standard 8-contact WHO ANC schedule at the primary health centre
B She is high-risk due to obesity; refer to a facility with specialist obstetric care and intensify surveillance
C She is low-risk; obesity in pregnancy requires no additional monitoring beyond routine ANC
D She is high-risk; immediate hospitalisation is required regardless of symptoms

Correct. BMI ≥35 is a recognised high-risk factor in pregnancy, associated with increased risks of gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, venous thromboembolism, and caesarean delivery. The inverted pyramid of care concentrates specialist resources on high-risk women — she should be referred to a higher-level facility with intensified surveillance, not managed at primary level alone. Immediate hospitalisation is not required at this stage as she has no active complications.

ANC risk stratification using the inverted pyramid concentrates specialist care resources on high-risk pregnancies. Recognised high-risk factors include BMI ≥35, previous caesarean, advanced maternal age, multiple pregnancy, hypertension, diabetes, cardiac disease, and renal disease. High-risk women should be referred to an appropriate level of care.

BMI ≥35 is a recognised high-risk factor. The inverted pyramid of care routes high-risk women to specialist facilities with intensified surveillance. This woman requires more than routine primary-level ANC, but immediate hospitalisation is not indicated without active complications.

Click to reveal answer

Q2 OG8.2 1 pt

A 32-year-old woman presents at booking. Her LMP was 10 March. She has a regular 28-day cycle. The date of her examination is 5 June. Using Naegele's rule, what is her EDD, and what is her current gestational age?

A EDD 17 December; gestational age approximately 12 weeks
B EDD 10 January; gestational age approximately 12 weeks
C EDD 17 December; gestational age approximately 16 weeks
D EDD 10 December; gestational age approximately 12 weeks

Correct. Naegele's rule: EDD = LMP + 9 months + 7 days (or equivalently, subtract 3 months and add 7 days). LMP 10 March: subtract 3 months = 10 December, add 7 days = 17 December. From LMP 10 March to examination date 5 June = 12 weeks (March has 31 days; 21 remaining days in March + 30 days April + 31 days May + 5 days June = 87 days ÷ 7 = 12 weeks 3 days, approximately 12 weeks).

Naegele's rule: EDD = LMP − 3 months + 7 days (assumes regular 28-day cycle). The rule is applied to the first day of the LMP. Gestational age is calculated from LMP in completed weeks and days. If the cycle is irregular or longer/shorter than 28 days, the rule requires adjustment.

Naegele's rule: subtract 3 months from LMP and add 7 days. LMP 10 March → 10 December + 7 days = 17 December. Duration from 10 March to 5 June ≈ 87 days ÷ 7 ≈ 12 weeks 3 days. EDD is 17 December; gestational age is approximately 12 weeks.

Click to reveal answer

Q3 OG8.3 1 pt

A 28-year-old primigravida at 30 weeks gestation is being examined. Leopold's second manoeuvre is performed. The examiner feels a smooth, resistant, curved structure on the maternal left side, and small, irregular nodular parts on the right side. What does this finding indicate?

A Cephalic presentation with the fetal back on the left and limbs on the right
B Breech presentation with the fetal back on the right and limbs on the left
C Transverse lie with the head on the maternal left side
D Cephalic presentation with the fetal back on the right and limbs on the left

Correct. Leopold's second manoeuvre assesses fetal lie and which side the back is on. A smooth, resistant, curved structure represents the fetal back; small, irregular, nodular parts represent fetal limbs. Finding the back on the left indicates left occipito-anterior/posterior positioning. This is most commonly associated with cephalic presentation.

Leopold's second manoeuvre (lateral palpation) identifies which side the fetal back is on. A smooth, curved, firm resistance = fetal back; irregular nodular structures = fetal limbs. This determines fetal position. The four Leopold manoeuvres systematically assess: (1) fundal content, (2) lateral position/lie, (3) presenting part, (4) engagement.

In Leopold's second manoeuvre, the smooth, resistant, curved structure is the fetal back, and the nodular, irregular parts are the fetal limbs (hands and feet). Back on the left = fetal spine oriented to the maternal left. Combined with a rounded pole at the fundus (Leopold 1) and engagement at the pelvis, this is consistent with cephalic presentation, back left.

Click to reveal answer

Q4 OG8.4 1 pt

A 34-week pregnancy is referred for reduced fetal movements for 3 days. A non-stress test (NST) shows 2 accelerations of at least 15 beats/min lasting at least 15 seconds in a 20-minute window. The biophysical profile (BPP) shows normal fetal tone, 3 discrete limb movements, one episode of fetal breathing lasting 30 seconds, and an amniotic fluid pool of 3 cm. What is the BPP score, and what action is recommended?

A BPP 8/10; reassure and repeat NST in one week
B BPP 10/10; reassure and maintain current ANC schedule
C BPP 8/10; the score is reassuring but close surveillance is recommended given reduced movements
D BPP 6/10; consider delivery

Correct. BPP scoring: reactive NST (+2), fetal tone present (+2), gross movements ≥3 (+2), breathing movement ≥1 episode lasting ≥30 s (+2) = 8/10. Amniotic fluid: the largest single vertical pocket ≥2 cm scores 2; a pool of 3 cm is borderline-adequate and some protocols give +2 here. BPP of 8/10 is generally reassuring, but in the context of persistent reduced fetal movements, close surveillance is warranted. A score of 6/10 would prompt consideration of delivery.

BPP scoring (each parameter 2 points): reactive NST, fetal tone (limb extension-flexion), ≥3 gross body movements, ≥1 breathing episode lasting ≥30 s, amniotic fluid single pocket ≥2 cm. Maximum 10. Score 8–10 = reassuring; 6 = equivocal (repeat or deliver based on gestation); ≤4 = immediate delivery planning.

BPP scoring: each parameter scores 2 if present, 0 if absent. Reactive NST (2 accels ≥15 bpm ×15 s in 20 min = +2); tone normal (+2); ≥3 limb movements (+2); breathing ≥30 s (+2); amniotic fluid single pocket ≥2 cm (+2). Here the NST, tone, movements, and breathing are all normal (+8). Fluid at 3 cm scores +2 under standard BPP criteria. Total = 10/10 is debatable but 8/10 is the conservative score given the clinical context. A score of 6/10 would require delivery planning.

Click to reveal answer

Q5 OG8.5 1 pt

A 38-week primigravida with height 148 cm presents. On clinical pelvimetry the diagonal conjugate is measured at 11 cm. The ischial spines are prominent and the sacrum is flat. What is the most likely pelvic classification and its clinical implication?

A Gynaecoid pelvis; normal delivery is expected
B Android pelvis; vaginal delivery is likely with oxytocin augmentation
C Contracted pelvis with likely CPD; elective caesarean section is indicated
D Platypelloid pelvis; face presentation is likely

Correct. Diagonal conjugate of 11 cm gives an estimated obstetric conjugate of 9–9.5 cm (11 minus 1.5–2 cm), which is below the normal threshold of ≥10 cm. Combined with height <150 cm (a known risk factor for contracted pelvis), prominent ischial spines (reduced interspinous diameter), and a flat sacrum (reduced AP outlet diameter), this clinical picture strongly suggests contracted pelvis with CPD. Elective caesarean section is the appropriate management.

Clinical pelvimetry: obstetric conjugate = diagonal conjugate − 1.5–2 cm (normal ≥10 cm). A diagonal conjugate <11.5 cm suggests potential inlet contraction. Additional markers of contracted pelvis: height <150 cm, prominent ischial spines, convergent sidewalls, flat/shortened sacrum. CPD confirmed clinically warrants planned caesarean section.

Diagonal conjugate 11 cm → obstetric conjugate approximately 9–9.5 cm (normal ≥10 cm) → inlet is contracted. Height <150 cm, prominent ischial spines, flat sacrum compound the risk. This is contracted pelvis with likely CPD, and elective caesarean section is indicated. Android or platypelloid pelvis descriptions do not fit this constellation of findings.

Click to reveal answer

Q6 OG8.6 1 pt

A 22-year-old primigravida at 20 weeks is vegetarian, comes from a low-income household, and is found to have a haemoglobin of 9.6 g/dL. She weighs 51 kg (pre-pregnancy 48 kg). Which nutritional intervention is MOST urgent and evidence-based for her current haemoglobin status?

A Add oral calcium 1.5–2 g/day in divided doses, as calcium deficiency is the primary cause
B Initiate therapeutic oral iron (120 mg elemental iron/day) and ensure adequate dietary iron sources
C Recommend intravenous iron sucrose as oral iron is ineffective for severe anaemia
D Prescribe folic acid 5 mg/day and check B12 levels before any intervention

Correct. Hb 9.6 g/dL at 20 weeks is moderate anaemia in pregnancy (defined as Hb <7 g/dL = severe; 7–10.9 g/dL = moderate; 11 g/dL is the first-trimester threshold). Moderate anaemia responds to therapeutic oral iron (120 mg elemental iron/day — double the prophylactic dose). IV iron is reserved for severe anaemia, malabsorption, or intolerance to oral therapy. Calcium supplementation is important but is not the urgent intervention for anaemia.

Anaemia in pregnancy: mild = Hb 10–10.9 g/dL, moderate = 7–9.9 g/dL, severe = <7 g/dL (first/third trimester threshold 11 g/dL; second trimester 10.5 g/dL). Moderate anaemia: therapeutic oral iron 120 mg elemental iron/day. Severe or unresponsive: IV iron or blood transfusion. Prophylactic dose = 60 mg/day.

Hb 9.6 g/dL = moderate anaemia (WHO: Hb 7.0–10.9 g/dL in pregnancy). The most urgent evidence-based intervention is therapeutic oral iron at 120 mg elemental iron/day (double the prophylactic dose of 60 mg). IV iron is reserved for severe (Hb <7 g/dL), malabsorption, or oral intolerance. Calcium supplementation addresses a separate deficiency.

Click to reveal answer

Q7 OG8.7 1 pt

A 24-year-old woman presents at 8 weeks gestation. She received 2 doses of Tetanus Toxoid in her first pregnancy 3 years ago. What is the correct TT vaccination plan for this pregnancy?

A No vaccination required; she is fully protected from the previous pregnancy doses
B Give one booster dose of TT in the second trimester of this pregnancy
C Give a full two-dose TT schedule starting at 16 weeks in this pregnancy
D TT is contraindicated in the first trimester; wait until 28 weeks

Correct. Under NHM guidelines: if a woman received a full TT course (2 doses) in a previous pregnancy within the last 3 years, she requires only one booster dose in the current pregnancy. If it has been more than 3 years since the last full course, a full two-dose schedule is given. TT is safe throughout pregnancy.

NHM TT vaccination schedule: previously unimmunised — give TT1 (early as possible) and TT2 (4 weeks later, preferably before 36 weeks). If received 2 doses in a previous pregnancy within 3 years — 1 booster only. If >3 years — full 2-dose course. TT is safe in all trimesters.

NHM TT protocol: if the woman received 2 TT doses in a previous pregnancy within the past 3 years, she needs only 1 booster dose in the current pregnancy. If >3 years since the last full course, restart the 2-dose schedule. TT is not contraindicated in any trimester — it is safe throughout pregnancy.

Click to reveal answer

Q8 OG8.8 1 pt

A 30-year-old woman at 18 weeks gestation is referred after a maternal serum AFP result of 3.5 multiples of the median (MoM). The most appropriate investigation to evaluate this finding is:

A Amniocentesis for chromosomal karyotyping
B Detailed mid-trimester anomaly scan (morphology ultrasound)
C First trimester combined screening with NT measurement
D Maternal serum HCG and unconjugated oestriol measurement

Correct. Elevated maternal serum AFP (>2.5–3.0 MoM) at 16–20 weeks is associated with open neural tube defects (anencephaly, open spina bifida), abdominal wall defects, multiple pregnancy, and incorrect gestational dating. The first investigation is a detailed anomaly ultrasound scan (mid-trimester morphology scan) to identify structural anomalies. Amniocentesis is invasive and not the first step. First-trimester combined screening is no longer relevant at 18 weeks.

Maternal serum AFP >2.5–3.0 MoM at 16–20 weeks: first investigate with detailed mid-trimester anomaly scan (18–22 weeks) to identify open NTDs, abdominal wall defects, or incorrect dating. Amniocentesis is the next step only if the scan is abnormal or inconclusive. AFP is also elevated in multiple pregnancy, renal abnormalities, and fetomaternal haemorrhage.

Elevated AFP (>2.5 MoM) at 16–20 weeks is a marker for open neural tube defects and other structural anomalies. The immediate next step is a detailed mid-trimester anomaly scan (morphology ultrasound) at 18–22 weeks to identify or exclude structural causes. Invasive testing (amniocentesis) is reserved for abnormal ultrasound findings.

Click to reveal answer

Q9 OG8.9 1 pt

A woman delivers a macerated stillborn at 38 weeks. Post-delivery investigation reveals a Kleihauer-Betke test positive for fetomaternal haemorrhage. Which of the following is the MOST important action for the mother's future obstetric management based on this finding?

A Advise permanent contraception as future pregnancies carry the same risk
B Ensure Rh typing; if Rh-negative, give an appropriate dose of anti-D immunoglobulin
C Schedule thrombophilia screening in the postpartum period
D The Kleihauer-Betke result does not change management

Correct. The Kleihauer-Betke test detects and quantifies fetal red cells in maternal circulation. In an Rh-negative mother, fetomaternal haemorrhage causing entry of Rh-positive fetal cells into maternal blood will cause alloimmunisation unless prevented by anti-D immunoglobulin. The dose is calculated based on the volume of fetomaternal haemorrhage identified. This is the most immediately actionable intervention to protect future pregnancies.

Kleihauer-Betke test quantifies fetal erythrocytes in maternal circulation. In Rh-negative mothers, this guides the dose of anti-D immunoglobulin needed to prevent alloimmunisation. Stillbirth investigation includes maternal blood group, indirect Coombs test, TORCH serology, glucose screen, thrombophilia screening, and fetal post-mortem if consented.

The Kleihauer-Betke test detects fetal red cells in maternal circulation. In an Rh-negative woman, undetected/untreated fetomaternal haemorrhage will cause Rh alloimmunisation, risking haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in subsequent pregnancies. The critical action is: check Rh status and give anti-D immunoglobulin in appropriate dose. Future pregnancies are not contraindicated.

Click to reveal answer

Q10 OG8.10 1 pt

A 32-year-old woman with one previous LSCS presents at 38 weeks requesting TOLAC. Ultrasound at 37 weeks shows a lower uterine segment thickness of 1.8 mm on the scar site. The lower uterine segment scar is intact with no bladder flap involvement. How does this ultrasound finding influence counselling?

A A lower segment thickness of 1.8 mm is within normal limits; TOLAC can be counselled without additional caution
B A lower segment thickness below 2 mm is associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture during TOLAC; elective repeat caesarean section is recommended
C Ultrasound measurement of scar thickness is not clinically validated and should not influence the decision
D TOLAC should proceed but with epidural analgesia to mask rupture pain

Correct. Ultrasound measurement of lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness at 35–38 weeks has been studied as a predictor of scar integrity. A LUS thickness of less than 2.0–2.5 mm (cut-off varies by study) is associated with a significantly increased risk of uterine rupture or dehiscence during TOLAC. While not an absolute contraindication in all guidelines, a measurement of 1.8 mm would typically prompt recommendation of elective repeat caesarean section in the counselling discussion, especially combined with the overall low-probability clinical scenario.

Ultrasound measurement of lower uterine segment thickness at 35–38 weeks: LUS <2.0–2.5 mm is associated with increased risk of uterine scar dehiscence/rupture during TOLAC. This finding, combined with clinical risk factors, informs the shared decision-making discussion. Elective repeat caesarean section is generally recommended when LUS is critically thinned.

Lower uterine segment thickness <2.0–2.5 mm at 35–38 weeks by ultrasound is associated with an increased risk of scar dehiscence/rupture during TOLAC. A measurement of 1.8 mm falls below this threshold and should prompt recommendation of elective repeat caesarean. Masking pain with epidural is not a safe substitute for addressing the mechanical risk.

Click to reveal answer

Q11 OG8.1 1 pt

A community health worker in a rural primary health centre identifies the following pregnant women at a routine camp. Which one should be IMMEDIATELY referred to a higher-level facility without delay?

A G2P1 at 24 weeks with documented mild anaemia (Hb 10.4 g/dL) on IFA supplementation, normotensive
B G1P0 at 32 weeks with blood pressure 168/112 mmHg on two readings, 2+ proteinuria, and headache
C G3P2 at 36 weeks with a previous LSCS scar, currently cephalic presentation, no labour
D G1P0 at 20 weeks with weight gain of only 3 kg since booking (pre-pregnancy BMI 21)

Correct. BP ≥160/110 mmHg on two readings plus proteinuria and symptoms (headache) at 32 weeks is severe pre-eclampsia — a hypertensive emergency of pregnancy. This woman requires immediate referral to a facility capable of administering MgSO4 (for seizure prophylaxis), antihypertensives (labetalol/hydralazine/oral nifedipine), and consideration of delivery. Delay increases the risk of eclampsia, stroke, and maternal and fetal death.

Severe-feature pre-eclampsia: BP ≥160/110 mmHg on two occasions + proteinuria OR end-organ dysfunction. Symptoms (headache, visual disturbances, epigastric pain) indicate severe features. Immediate management: MgSO4 (Pritchard or Zuspan regimen), antihypertensive (labetalol IV / hydralazine IV / nifedipine oral), and delivery planning at a tertiary centre.

Severe pre-eclampsia (BP ≥160/110 + proteinuria + symptoms) is an obstetric emergency requiring immediate transfer. The threshold for severe-feature hypertension is ≥160/110 mmHg. MgSO4, IV antihypertensives, and delivery planning are needed at a well-equipped centre. The other patients have risks that require monitoring but not immediate emergency transfer.

Click to reveal answer

Q12 OG8.8 1 pt

At a booking visit at 10 weeks gestation, a woman asks for the 'sex-determination test' during her ultrasound. The clinician correctly declines. What is the legal basis for this refusal?

A The MTP Act 2021 prohibits sex determination for all gestations
B The PCPNDT Act 1994 prohibits the use of ultrasound or any other technique for sex determination
C The Consumer Protection Act 2019 limits medical procedures to clinically indicated tests only
D The NMC Act 2020 makes non-indicated investigations an ethical violation but not a legal one

Correct. The Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act 1994 (PCPNDT Act) specifically prohibits the use of any diagnostic technique, including ultrasound, for the purpose of sex selection/determination. Violations carry criminal penalties. The MTP Act governs termination of pregnancy and does not directly address sex determination at booking.

PCPNDT Act 1994: prohibits sex determination using any diagnostic technique at any gestational age. Extends to pre-conception sex selection. Covers all practitioners, sonographers, and institutions. Never frame any investigation as sex-determination; never suggest or imply the possibility in clinical practice.

The PCPNDT Act 1994 is the specific legislation prohibiting sex determination using any diagnostic technique including ultrasound. This applies to all gestations. The MTP Act governs termination conditions, not sex determination. PCPNDT violations carry criminal penalties.

Click to reveal answer