Page 11 of 20

PE21.4 | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus — SDL Guide (Part 2)

Management of Paediatric SLE

The management of paediatric SLE requires a tiered approach based on the severity of organ involvement. The overarching goals are suppressing active disease, preventing flares, minimising treatment toxicity, and preserving long-term organ function — particularly renal. Unlike many chronic diseases in paediatrics, SLE management is lifelong, and the cumulative burden of glucocorticoid toxicity (growth failure, avascular necrosis, metabolic syndrome) is a major concern in adolescents.

Tier 1 — Anchor therapy for all patients:
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 5 mg/kg/day (max 400 mg/day) is the cornerstone disease-modifying drug for ALL children with SLE without contraindication. It reduces flare frequency, reduces corticosteroid requirements, prevents end-organ damage, and reduces mortality — the only drug in SLE with evidence of survival benefit. Mechanism: inhibits TLR7/9 activation (prevents endosomal recognition of nuclear DNA/RNA), suppresses cytokine production, and has antiplatelet effects. Monitor for retinal toxicity (annual ophthalmological review after 5 years of use). Sun avoidance and sunscreen SPF ≥30 (photosensitivity is both a symptom and a trigger for flares — UV light drives DNA photo-oxidation and increases nuclear auto-antigen availability).

Tier 2 — Mild to moderate SLE (constitutional, skin, joint, mild serositis — no renal, no CNS, no severe haematological):
• NSAIDs: naproxen or ibuprofen for arthritis/arthralgia and pleuritis (weight-based dosing)
Low-to-moderate dose prednisolone 0.5–1 mg/kg/day: for flares, tapered over 6–8 weeks
• Add hydroxychloroquine if not already started
• Methotrexate or azathioprine as steroid-sparing agents for frequent relapses

Tier 3 — Severe SLE (lupus nephritis Class III/IV, CNS lupus, severe haematological):
Lupus nephritis (Class III/IV) — induction (6 months):
• Prednisolone 1–2 mg/kg/day (pulses of methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg IV on days 1–3 for severe nephritis) PLUS
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 600 mg/m²/dose twice daily (preferred — equivalent efficacy to cyclophosphamide with less gonadal toxicity, hair loss, and infection risk — IAP and EULAR recommended) OR
Cyclophosphamide IV (Euro-Lupus pulse: 500 mg IV every 2 weeks × 6 doses) for rapidly progressive nephritis or unresponsive to MMF

Maintenance (years): hydroxychloroquine + low-dose prednisolone + MMF (or azathioprine 2 mg/kg/day)

CNS lupus: high-dose methylprednisolone pulses + cyclophosphamide for severe manifestations (psychosis, seizures, transverse myelitis)

Haematological crises (severe thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia): IVIG 1–2 g/kg + high-dose steroids; rituximab for refractory cases

Monitoring schedule (every 1–3 months in active disease): BP, urinalysis + protein:creatinine ratio, serum creatinine/eGFR, CBC + differential, ESR/CRP, anti-dsDNA, complement C3/C4, fasting lipids (glucocorticoid-related dyslipidaemia), HbA1c (glucocorticoid-related hyperglycaemia), DEXA scan annually (bone density — glucocorticoid-related osteoporosis → calcium + vitamin D supplementation)

Vaccination: inactivated vaccines on schedule (flu annual, pneumococcal); live vaccines (MMR, varicella) — only in remission on ≤10 mg/day prednisolone and not on high-dose immunosuppression; avoid live vaccines on cyclophosphamide

A six-panel infographic classifies lupus nephritis Classes I to VI by glomerular histology, clinical significance, and treatment implication, with Classes III and IV highlighted for induction immunosuppression.

ISN/RPS Lupus Nephritis Classification

Panel A: Class I minimal mesangial lupus nephritis: normal light microscopy appearance, mesangial immune deposits, usually clinically silent, no nephritis-specific immunosuppression.. Panel B: Class II mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis: mesangial hypercellularity, mesangial immune deposits, mild proteinuria or hematuria, conservative therapy plus lupus control.. Panel C: Class III focal lupus nephritis: focal segmental or global proliferative lesions in less than 50 percent of glomeruli, active inflammation or crescents, requires induction immunosuppression.. Panel D: Class IV diffuse lupus nephritis: diffuse proliferative lesions in 50 percent or more of glomeruli, wire-loop lesions, necrosis and crescents, highest renal risk and requires aggressive induction immunosuppression.. Panel E: Class V membranous lupus nephritis: thickened capillary walls, subepithelial immune deposits, nephrotic-range proteinuria, treatment depends on severity and coexisting proliferative disease.. Panel F: Class VI advanced sclerosing lupus nephritis: globally sclerosed glomeruli, chronic irreversible scarring, low active inflammation, supportive chronic kidney disease care rather than induction therapy..

SELF-CHECK

A 13-year-old girl with SLE and biopsy-proven Class IV lupus nephritis (diffuse proliferative) is being started on induction therapy. Which of the following treatment combinations is evidence-based first-line induction for Class IV lupus nephritis in a paediatric patient?

A. Hydroxychloroquine alone — adequate for all classes of lupus nephritis

B. High-dose prednisolone alone for 6 months

C. Prednisolone + mycophenolate mofetil (or cyclophosphamide) for 6 months

D. Prednisolone + azathioprine — first-line for Class IV nephritis

Reveal Answer

Answer: C. Prednisolone + mycophenolate mofetil (or cyclophosphamide) for 6 months

Class IV lupus nephritis (diffuse proliferative — ≥50% of glomeruli affected) is the most severe and most common class in paediatric SLE. It requires aggressive induction therapy to prevent progression to end-stage renal disease. Evidence-based induction (EULAR, IAP, and ACR guidelines) is prednisolone PLUS either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclophosphamide for 6 months. MMF is preferred in most paediatric centres because it achieves equivalent efficacy with less gonadal toxicity, less infection risk, and fewer adverse effects than cyclophosphamide. Azathioprine is used for maintenance (not induction). Hydroxychloroquine alone is not adequate for Class IV nephritis — it is the anchor for mild-moderate disease.

Self-Assessment

Apply your understanding of paediatric SLE to these clinical scenarios.

Case 1: A 16-year-old girl presents with a 4-month history of fatigue, joint pain (wrists, fingers), a facial rash, and hair loss. On examination: butterfly malar rash, mouth ulcers, mild synovitis of both wrists. CBC: Hb 9.8 g/dL (normocytic), WBC 2,800/µL, platelets 88,000/µL. Urinalysis: 3+ protein, 2+ blood. BP: 136/86 mmHg. How many SLICC criteria does she meet? Which investigations should you order next?

Expected answer: SLICC clinical criteria met: malar rash (1) + oral ulcers (1) + non-scarring alopecia (1) + arthritis (1) + leukopenia <4,000 (1) + thrombocytopenia <100,000 (1) + renal (proteinuria >500 mg/24h implied by 3+ on dipstick) (1) = 7 clinical criteria. Need at least 1 immunological criterion to classify. Order: ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, antiphospholipid antibodies, complement C3/C4, direct Coombs test. If ANA positive (very likely given this picture), she meets SLICC criteria. Also: urine protein:creatinine ratio, serum creatinine — if nephritis confirmed, renal biopsy to determine ISN/RPS class.

Case 2: A 14-year-old with SLE on hydroxychloroquine and low-dose prednisolone has been in remission for 8 months. At today's visit: no symptoms, BP normal, urine dipstick negative, Hb 12.2 g/dL, WBC 5,200/µL, platelets 180,000/µL. But anti-dsDNA has risen from 45 to 210 IU/mL and C3 has fallen from 0.94 to 0.52 g/L. What is the significance of these results and what is your next step?

Expected answer: Rising anti-dsDNA + falling C3 indicates an impending flare (serologically active SLE), even though the patient is currently asymptomatic. This pattern predicts nephritis flare days to weeks before clinical manifestations. Next step: repeat urine protein:creatinine ratio and creatinine to check for early renal involvement; increase monitoring frequency to every 2–4 weeks; discuss with rheumatology about whether to increase hydroxychloroquine or add azathioprine/MMF before the flare becomes clinically overt. Do not wait for symptoms.

Case 3: A 12-year-old boy with SLE develops sudden-onset severe headache, confusion, and a generalised tonic-clonic seizure. He has been off prednisolone for 2 months (family stopped it themselves). His last CBC showed thrombocytopenia. ANA 1:640, anti-dsDNA markedly elevated, C3 undetectable. What is the diagnosis and immediate management?

Expected answer: Neuropsychiatric SLE (CNS lupus) — seizure as presentation, likely exacerbated by stopping immunosuppression. Must exclude other causes (intracranial infection, hypertensive encephalopathy, thrombotic microangiopathy in antiphospholipid syndrome). Immediate: secure airway, IV access, IV methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg (pulse), anti-epileptic as needed. Admit to HDU. Urgent MRI brain (NPSLE can show white-matter changes, cerebral vasculitis, posterior reversible encephalopathy). Restart and intensify immunosuppression under rheumatology/neurology guidance.

Interactive practice: True / False

Interactive practice: Multiple Choice