Page 10 of 12

PE28.1-5 | Allergy and Asthma — Graded Quiz

Graded 10 questions · Untimed · 2 attempts

Click any question card to reveal the correct answer.

Q1 PE28.3 1 pt

A 6-year-old (weight 20 kg) presents to the emergency with severe asthma exacerbation: unable to complete a full sentence, RR 46/min, using accessory muscles, SpO₂ 87% on room air, silent chest on auscultation. Salbutamol 0.15 mg/kg nebulised ×3 doses over 1 hour have been given with no improvement. What is the most appropriate immediate additional intervention?

A Add ipratropium bromide nebulisation alone and reassess after 30 minutes
B Administer IV magnesium sulphate 25–75 mg/kg (max 2 g) over 20 minutes AND prepare for ICU admission
C Increase salbutamol to 0.3 mg/kg per dose and continue outpatient nebulisation
D Start oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg and observe for 4 hours before escalation

Life-threatening or near-fatal asthma (silent chest, SpO₂ <90% despite maximal bronchodilator, unable to speak) unresponsive to first-line therapy requires IV MgSO₄ 25–75 mg/kg (max 2 g) over 20 minutes as per GINA/IAP guidelines, alongside ICU-level monitoring and preparation for mechanical ventilation if needed.

Life-threatening asthma with silent chest and failure of standard bronchodilators requires IV MgSO₄ 25–75 mg/kg (max 2 g) over 20 minutes plus IV corticosteroids and ICU transfer. Mechanical ventilation is a last resort but must be anticipated.

Ipratropium alone without additional escalation is insufficient for life-threatening asthma. High-dose salbutamol outpatient is not appropriate for silent chest. Oral prednisolone alone with 4-hour observation is dangerously inadequate in this severity class — IV corticosteroids and ICU transfer are needed.

Click to reveal answer

Q2 PE28.3 1 pt

A 10-year-old with asthma uses a salbutamol pMDI more than 3 times a week for relief. He has nocturnal cough twice a month. Spirometry shows FEV1 78% predicted with 15% reversibility. He is currently on no controller medication. According to GINA, which initial controller therapy is most appropriate?

A No controller needed — salbutamol on demand is sufficient for mild intermittent asthma
B Low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (e.g. budesonide 100–200 mcg/day or equivalent) as step 2
C Low-dose ICS plus LABA combination as step 3 from the outset
D Montelukast alone as first-line controller in school-age children with asthma

Salbutamol use >2 days/week plus nocturnal symptoms >2×/month classifies this as at least mild persistent asthma, requiring a controller. GINA Step 2 = low-dose ICS (budesonide 100–200 mcg/day, or fluticasone propionate 100–200 mcg/day), which is the most effective and evidence-based first controller choice.

Mild persistent asthma in children is treated with Step 2: low-dose ICS (budesonide or fluticasone). ICS reduces airway inflammation, exacerbations, and steroid burst requirements. Step up if uncontrolled on low-dose ICS after 6–8 weeks.

Symptom frequency exceeds mild-intermittent threshold, so SABA-only management is inadequate. ICS+LABA is Step 3 and would be over-treatment at initial presentation without trialling ICS alone. Montelukast (leukotriene receptor antagonist) is an alternative second-line controller, not first-line in school-age children with persistent asthma.

Click to reveal answer

Q3 PE28.2 1 pt

A 14-year-old athlete with well-controlled asthma on low-dose ICS asks about exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Which statement is most accurate regarding prevention and management of EIB?

A Salbutamol 200 mcg by pMDI 15 minutes before exercise is the most effective prophylaxis for EIB
B EIB is a contraindication to competitive sport; the child should be advised to avoid all exercise
C LABA salmeterol is the preferred long-term prophylaxis for EIB as monotherapy without ICS
D Cromolyn sodium by nebulisation taken 2 hours before exercise is the first-choice prophylaxis

Short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA) — salbutamol 200 mcg by pMDI 15 minutes before exercise — is the most effective and widely recommended prophylaxis for EIB. It provides protection for 2–4 hours post-exercise. Optimising baseline ICS control also reduces EIB frequency.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction is managed with pre-exercise salbutamol 200 mcg 15 minutes before activity. Optimising baseline ICS controller reduces exercise triggers. EIB is not a contraindication to sport in children.

Exercise is encouraged — EIB is manageable, not a reason to ban sport. LABA monotherapy for EIB is contraindicated (no ICS = unsafe). Cromolyn sodium (mast-cell stabiliser) is an older, less effective alternative that requires inhalation 20–30 minutes before exercise — not 2 hours, and not first choice.

Click to reveal answer

Q4 PE28.1 1 pt

A 9-year-old with perennial allergic rhinitis sensitive to house dust mite (confirmed by skin-prick test) has been using an intranasal corticosteroid for 8 weeks with partial control. The physician considers allergen immunotherapy. Which statement about subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) in this context is correct?

A SCIT is contraindicated in children below 12 years of age
B SCIT is indicated for IgE-mediated allergic rhinitis when symptoms are inadequately controlled by pharmacotherapy; it can modify the underlying allergic disease
C SCIT provides temporary symptom relief only during the 3–5 year course and has no durable post-treatment benefit
D Oral antihistamines achieve equivalent long-term disease modification compared to allergen immunotherapy

Allergen immunotherapy (subcutaneous or sublingual) is indicated for IgE-mediated allergic rhinitis with confirmed sensitisation when pharmacotherapy provides inadequate control. Uniquely, it modifies the underlying allergic immune response (reduces IgE, induces regulatory T cells and IgG4), offering benefit that persists for years after completing the 3–5 year course.

Allergen immunotherapy modifies the underlying allergic response, provides durable post-treatment benefit, may prevent asthma development in AR patients, and is indicated when pharmacotherapy is insufficient for IgE-mediated disease with confirmed sensitisation.

SCIT is used in children including those under 12 years in many centres (though some centres prefer sublingual for younger children due to anaphylaxis risk). Immunotherapy does provide durable post-treatment benefit — this is its key advantage over pharmacotherapy. Antihistamines provide symptomatic relief only, not disease modification.

Click to reveal answer

Q5 PE28.4 1 pt

Which of the following is a CORRECT indication for spirometry / pulmonary function testing (PFT) in a child?

A Confirming asthma diagnosis in a cooperative child aged 4 years with recurrent wheeze
B Monitoring response to bronchodilator therapy in a 7-year-old with diagnosed asthma and persistent symptoms
C Diagnosing asthma in infants below 2 years of age as a first-line investigation
D Excluding lung disease in a well child with no respiratory symptoms as part of routine school screening

PFT (spirometry) indications in paediatrics include: confirming and classifying obstructive, restrictive, or mixed lung disease; assessing severity of known asthma; monitoring response to therapy; detecting exercise-induced bronchoconstriction; and pre-operative pulmonary risk assessment. Monitoring an older child (≥5 years, cooperative) with known asthma is a clear indication. Spirometry requires cooperation and is reliable from approximately age 5–6 years.

Spirometry is reliable in cooperative children aged ≥5–6 years. Key indications: diagnosis and severity classification of asthma, reversibility testing, monitoring response to therapy, and evaluation of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Spirometry requires active cooperation and reproducible manoeuvres — generally reliable from age 5–6 years, not age 4. Infants below 2 years cannot perform standard spirometry (infant lung function tests are specialised research tools). Routine spirometry in well children without symptoms is not a standard indication.

Click to reveal answer

Q6 PE28.5 1 pt

A nurse setting up a jet nebuliser for a 3-year-old with acute asthma asks the observer (a final-year student) what they should check before starting. Which observation is MOST important for effective drug delivery?

A The nebuliser cup volume is filled to the maximum (8 mL) to deliver the highest drug concentration
B The mask fits snugly on the child's face and the driving gas flow is set at 6–8 L/min
C The child is supine to prevent drug spillage from the nebuliser cup during treatment
D The nebuliser is held at 45 degrees to the horizontal to maximise aerosol output

Effective jet nebulisation requires: a properly fitting mask (or mouthpiece in older children) to prevent drug loss; an upright position; and a driving gas flow of 6–8 L/min to generate particles in the 1–5 µm respirable range. Mask fit is critical — a 1-cm gap can waste 50% of the dose.

For paediatric nebulisation: use an upright position, a properly fitting face mask, 4–5 mL fill volume, and 6–8 L/min driving gas. A snug mask is the single most critical factor for drug delivery in young children.

Maximum fill volume does not improve efficiency — the optimal fill volume is 4–5 mL (drug + diluent); overfilling increases residual volume. Supine position is incorrect — nebulisation should be in an upright (sitting) position for comfort and optimal lung expansion. A 45-degree tilt reduces aerosol output significantly.

Click to reveal answer

Q7 PE28.4 1 pt

A 13-year-old with asthma on Step 3 (low-dose ICS + LABA) is not achieving good control (2 exacerbations/year, daily symptoms). Adherence and inhaler technique are confirmed adequate. The physician considers stepping up. Before stepping to Step 4, which investigation is most useful to guide further management?

A Chest X-ray to rule out structural abnormality causing refractory symptoms
B Spirometry with bronchodilator reversibility to reassess current lung function and obstruction pattern
C Serum IgE level only, without functional testing, to determine if anti-IgE therapy is appropriate
D Full blood count to check eosinophil count before any further respiratory assessment

Before stepping up in a child who appears adherent and has good technique, repeating spirometry with bronchodilator reversibility quantifies current obstruction severity, confirms the diagnosis, detects fixed obstruction (alternative diagnoses like vocal cord dysfunction), and guides whether step-up, add-on therapy, or referral is needed.

Before stepping up asthma treatment in a seemingly adherent patient, spirometry with reversibility should be repeated to confirm the diagnosis, quantify severity, and exclude alternative diagnoses. Objective spirometric data guides the step-up decision.

CXR is useful for ruling out structural/infective causes but does not guide step-up directly. Serum IgE can support decision for omalizumab (Step 5+) but requires functional assessment first. FBC eosinophil count is relevant if biologic (anti-IL5) therapy is considered but should follow functional assessment.

Click to reveal answer

Q8 PE28.2 1 pt

The pathophysiology of childhood asthma involves both early and late phase allergic responses. Which mediator is primarily responsible for the late-phase bronchospasm occurring 4–8 hours after allergen exposure?

A Histamine released from mast cells within minutes of allergen exposure
B Leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, LTE4) and eosinophil-derived mediators driving airway inflammation
C IgG subclass antibodies causing complement-mediated bronchospasm
D Bradykinin released by basophil degranulation in the early phase

The early phase (within 15–30 minutes) is driven by IgE-mediated mast-cell degranulation releasing histamine and early-release leukotrienes. The late phase (4–8 hours) is driven by eosinophil-mediated inflammation with cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, LTE4), IL-5, eosinophil cationic protein, and major basic protein causing sustained airway inflammation, oedema, and mucus hypersecretion.

Childhood asthma has a biphasic response: early phase (0–1 h, mast cells, histamine) and late phase (4–8 h, eosinophils, cysteinyl leukotrienes, IL-4/5/13). ICS target the late-phase inflammation; leukotriene antagonists (montelukast) target the leukotriene arm.

Histamine is a key early-phase mediator, not the primary late-phase driver. IgG/complement do not drive the classical allergic late-phase response. Bradykinin contributes to cough and airway oedema but is not the key late-phase mediator.

Click to reveal answer

Q9 PE28.3 1 pt

A 5-year-old with moderate persistent asthma is prescribed a metered-dose inhaler with a spacer. The parent reports the child cries and struggles every time the mask is used. Which practical advice is most appropriate?

A Switch to a nebuliser for home use since it does not require cooperation
B Hold the mask 1–2 cm from the face rather than on the face to reduce anxiety, and use distraction/play technique
C Encourage gradual familiarisation with the mask during non-treatment times and use the mask properly (airtight seal) with distraction and reward systems
D Temporarily stop ICS and use salbutamol nebulisation only until the child is older and more cooperative

Mask aversion is common in toddlers. Evidence-based strategies include familiarising the child with the mask during play (between medication times), using reward charts, distraction with toys or songs, and having a parent hold the child. A proper airtight seal is critical — holding the mask off the face ('blow-by') reduces drug delivery by up to 80% and is not recommended.

For mask aversion in young children, use familiarisation and play-based introduction rather than switching to blow-by or discontinuing therapy. An airtight mask seal is mandatory — blow-by (mask off face) is ineffective and should never be recommended.

Home nebulisers are not preferred for routine controller therapy — pMDI+spacer is equally effective when used correctly and involves less drug waste. Holding the mask away from the face (blow-by) dramatically reduces drug delivery and is specifically discouraged. Stopping controller ICS and relying on rescue nebulisation alone leads to poor asthma control.

Click to reveal answer

Q10 PE28.1 1 pt

A 12-year-old girl with allergic rhinitis co-morbid with mild asthma is to be started on an antihistamine. The physician wishes to minimise the risk of worsening asthma. Which antihistamine profile is safest and most appropriate?

A Promethazine (first-generation) — potent antihistamine, weight-dosed 0.25 mg/kg/dose
B Chlorpheniramine (first-generation) — preferred for its proven efficacy in paediatric AR
C Cetirizine (second-generation) — weight-dosed, minimal sedation, no anticholinergic-induced sputum thickening
D Diphenhydramine (first-generation) — most studied antihistamine in the paediatric population

Second-generation antihistamines such as cetirizine or loratadine are preferred in children with AR and co-morbid asthma. They cause minimal sedation, lack significant anticholinergic effects (which can thicken bronchial secretions and impair mucociliary clearance in asthma), and are weight-dosed (cetirizine 0.25 mg/kg/dose once or twice daily, max 10 mg/day).

In children with allergic rhinitis and comorbid asthma, second-generation antihistamines (cetirizine, loratadine, fexofenadine) are preferred because they lack the anticholinergic effects of first-generation agents that can worsen asthma by thickening secretions and impairing mucociliary clearance.

First-generation antihistamines (promethazine, chlorpheniramine, diphenhydramine) have potent anticholinergic effects that can thicken airway secretions, impair mucociliary clearance, and worsen asthma control. They also cause sedation, impairing school performance.

Click to reveal answer