Page 16 of 17
PE3.1-4,PE4.1-2 | Developmental Disorders — Assignment
CLINICAL SCENARIO
This assignment asks you to construct a structured case write-up for a child presenting with a developmental concern — either global developmental delay, Autism Spectrum Disorder, or ADHD — as would be encountered in a Child Developmental Unit (CDU) in an Indian tertiary hospital. You will perform a systematic developmental assessment, interpret screening tool results, formulate a working diagnosis, propose a multidisciplinary management plan, and document a parent counselling interaction. This task develops the clinical reasoning and communication skills essential for managing neurodevelopmental disorders in paediatric practice.
Instructions
1. Choose ONE of the following case vignettes assigned by your faculty OR construct a de-identified real case from your CDU visit (PE3.4):
- Case A: A 2-year-old boy with no words, poor eye contact, and repetitive behaviours (suspected ASD)
- Case B: A 3.5-year-old girl with delayed milestones across all domains (suspected GDD/intellectual disability)
- Case C: A 7-year-old boy with inattention and impulsivity in school and at home (suspected ADHD)
- Write a structured case write-up covering the following sections (see scaffolding below).
- Apply the M-CHAT (for ASD cases) or DASII scoring framework (for GDD/ID cases) and interpret the result within your write-up.
- Formulate a multidisciplinary management plan naming specific team members and their roles.
- Write a 150–200 word summary of how you would counsel the parents, including the key messages and the communication approach you would use.
- Submit as a structured document of 800–1200 words (excluding references).
- Cite at least two references (Ghai Essential Pediatrics, Nelson Textbook, or IAP guidelines).
Length: 800–1200 words (excluding references). The parental counselling section should be 150–200 words.
What to Submit
Section 1: Case Presentation
Guidance: Present the case using structured history: demographic details (age, sex), presenting complaint, detailed developmental history (milestones achieved vs expected for age across motor, language, social-adaptive, and fine motor domains), antenatal and birth history (prematurity, perinatal asphyxia, infections, alcohol/drug exposure), family history (consanguinity, similar conditions in siblings/relatives), and socioeconomic/educational background.
Section 2: Developmental Assessment Findings
Guidance: Describe the physical examination (dysmorphic features, head circumference, neurological examination) and the structured developmental assessment findings. If using M-CHAT: state the total score and critical item score and interpret the result. If using DASII: calculate and interpret the developmental quotient (DQ = developmental age ÷ chronological age × 100) for each domain. Specify which milestones are delayed, by how many months, and in how many domains.
Section 3: Differential Diagnosis and Working Diagnosis
Guidance: List at least three differential diagnoses with brief reasoning for each. State your working diagnosis with justification (citing DSM-5 or ICD-11 criteria for ADHD or ASD, or WHO/IAP definition for GDD). Specify relevant investigations you would order (e.g., audiometry, karyotype/chromosomal microarray, thyroid function, MRI brain) and your reasoning for each.
Section 4: Multidisciplinary Management Plan
Guidance: Name each team member in the CDU (developmental paediatrician, speech-language pathologist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, clinical psychologist, special educator, social worker) and their specific role for THIS child. Specify therapeutic interventions (e.g., ABA therapy for ASD, parent-management training for ADHD, physiotherapy for motor delay). Mention educational entitlements under the RPWD Act 2016 that are relevant.
Section 5: Parental Counselling Summary
Guidance: Write a 150–200 word summary of your counselling interaction. Include: (a) how you opened the conversation (empathic acknowledgement of parental concern and distress); (b) the key diagnostic message you delivered in plain language; (c) what you said about cause and prognosis; (d) what you told the parents about immediate next steps; (e) what resources/support groups you signposted (e.g., AIDE India for autism, ADHD India for ADHD, state-level disability services). Reflect on one communication challenge you anticipated and how you addressed it.
Grading Rubric — Developmental Assessment and Counselling Rubric
| Criterion | Points | Full-marks descriptor |
|---|---|---|
| Completeness and accuracy of developmental history and milestone assessment | 20 pts | All developmental domains documented with precise milestone ages; antenatal, birth, family, and social history complete; milestone delays quantified in months and mapped to domains. |
| Correct application and interpretation of M-CHAT or DASII | 15 pts | Correct tool selected for case type; scoring applied accurately; DQ or M-CHAT score computed correctly; result interpreted with appropriate clinical significance (normal vs borderline vs delayed). |
| Diagnostic reasoning — differential diagnosis and working diagnosis with DSM-5/ICD-11 criteria | 20 pts | Three or more appropriate differentials listed with clear reasoning; working diagnosis supported by explicit DSM-5 or ICD-11 criteria; investigations logically justified with clinical reasoning for each. |
| Multidisciplinary management plan — completeness and role specification | 20 pts | All relevant CDU team members named with their specific role for this case; therapeutic interventions specified (ABA/PMT/physio/OT as appropriate); RPWD Act 2016 educational entitlements mentioned accurately. |
| Quality of parental counselling summary — empathy, accuracy, and communication strategy | 25 pts | Counselling summary demonstrates empathic opening; accurate diagnosis communicated in plain language; cause explained without blame; prognosis is honest and constructive; specific resources/support groups mentioned; communication challenge identified and addressed; 150–200 words. |
PEER REVIEW
Your peer reviewer will assess your case write-up using the same rubric. Provide written feedback on: (1) accuracy of developmental milestone assessment and screening tool use; (2) strength of diagnostic reasoning — are DSM-5/ICD-11 criteria correctly applied?; (3) completeness of the MDT plan; (4) quality of the counselling summary — was it empathic and information-rich? Give at least two specific suggestions for improvement. Feedback should be constructive, specific, and 150–250 words.