Page 15 of 17

RD7.4 | Imaging in Surgery — Graded Quiz

Graded 8 questions · Untimed · 2 attempts

Click any question card to reveal the correct answer.

Q1 RD7.4 1 pt

A 35-year-old man fell from a ladder and meets a high-risk criterion on the Canadian CT Head Rule (GCS less than 15 at 2 hours, two episodes of vomiting). Which single statement about imaging in head injury is correct?

A Non-contrast CT head is the modality of choice and is selected because acute blood is hyperdense without contrast
B MRI brain is the first-line scan in all acute head injuries
C A skull radiograph is sufficient to exclude intracranial haematoma
D Every head-injury patient should be scanned regardless of risk
E Contrast is required to detect acute extradural blood

Correct. NCCT head is first-line because acute blood is hyperdense on unenhanced CT, and the scan rapidly shows haematoma, mass effect and fractures.

Use a validated rule to decide who to scan, then NCCT head first — acute blood is hyperdense without contrast.

NCCT head is the modality of choice — acute blood is hyperdense without contrast. Validated rules (Canadian CT Head Rule / NICE) decide who to scan; MRI and skull X-ray are not the acute first-line.

Click to reveal answer

Q2 RD7.4 1 pt

A head-injury CT shows a hyperdense, crescent-shaped extra-axial collection over the left cerebral convexity that crosses the suture lines but does not cross the midline. Which lesion does this describe?

A Extradural haematoma
B Acute subdural haematoma
C Chronic calcified granuloma
D Arteriovenous malformation
E Brain abscess

Correct. A crescentic collection that crosses sutures but not the midline is an acute subdural haematoma, usually venous from torn bridging veins.

Subdural = crescentic, crosses sutures but not the midline, venous; extradural = biconvex, does not cross sutures, arterial.

Crescentic + crosses sutures + does not cross the midline = subdural haematoma (venous, bridging veins). The biconvex collection that does not cross sutures is extradural (arterial).

Click to reveal answer

Q3 RD7.4 1 pt

A young man involved in a high-speed collision has a GCS of 6 but his initial non-contrast CT head shows no significant haematoma or mass effect, out of proportion to his profound impairment. Which investigation best demonstrates the suspected underlying injury?

A Repeat plain skull radiograph
B MRI brain (for diffuse axonal injury)
C Carotid Doppler ultrasound
D Abdominal CT
E Bone scan

Correct. MRI is far more sensitive than CT for diffuse axonal injury, which classically causes a clinical state far worse than the CT appearances suggest.

DAI: profound deficit with a relatively normal CT — MRI is the investigation that demonstrates it.

When clinical impairment is out of proportion to a near-normal CT, suspect diffuse axonal injury — MRI is the sensitive investigation for DAI.

Click to reveal answer

Q4 RD7.4 1 pt

A 66-year-old man has a tense, tender, irreducible right inguinal hernia with vomiting and distension and is clearly strangulated on examination. After starting resuscitation, what is the correct management approach regarding imaging?

A Proceed to emergency surgery after resuscitation; do not delay for a confirmatory scan
B Wait for an outpatient MRI before deciding
C Perform a barium enema to confirm the level of obstruction
D Discharge with analgesia and review in clinic
E Attempt forceful manual reduction of the strangulated contents

Correct. An obviously strangulated hernia is a surgical emergency — resuscitate and operate. Confirmatory imaging is reserved for equivocal cases and must not delay surgery.

Strangulation is a clinical diagnosis; resuscitate then operate. Imaging confirms equivocal cases only and must not delay surgery.

An obvious strangulated hernia goes to theatre after resuscitation. Do not delay for imaging, do not use barium, and do not forcefully reduce potentially ischaemic bowel.

Click to reveal answer

Q5 RD7.4 1 pt

In an equivocal case of suspected strangulated hernia, a contrast-enhanced CT is obtained. Which combination of findings best indicates a closed-loop, ischaemic (strangulated) segment?

A Bowel-wall thickening, absent/poor wall enhancement, closed-loop configuration and free fluid
B Thin, normally enhancing wall with no free fluid
C Fat-only hernia sac with no bowel content
D Diffuse colonic haustration only
E Free intraperitoneal air with no bowel dilatation

Correct. Wall thickening, absent/poor enhancement (ischaemia), a closed loop and free fluid together indicate a strangulated segment needing emergency operation.

CT signs of strangulation: bowel-wall thickening, absent/poor wall enhancement, closed-loop configuration, free fluid.

Strangulation on CT = wall thickening + absent/poor enhancement (ischaemia) + closed loop + free fluid. Normally enhancing thin wall or a fat-only sac argues against it.

Click to reveal answer

Q6 RD7.4 1 pt

A 28-year-old woman who is 18 weeks pregnant has right iliac fossa pain suspicious of appendicitis, but a graded-compression ultrasound is inconclusive. Which is the most appropriate next imaging investigation?

A Contrast-enhanced CT abdomen
B MRI abdomen
C Plain abdominal radiograph
D Barium follow-through
E Repeat the same ultrasound in 48 hours and observe

Correct. In pregnancy, when ultrasound is inconclusive, MRI is the next investigation because it avoids ionising radiation while giving good diagnostic accuracy.

Appendicitis modality by population: USG first (children/young/pregnant); CT for adults/obese/equivocal; MRI in pregnancy when USG is inconclusive.

In pregnancy with an inconclusive USG, MRI is preferred next — it avoids the ionising radiation of CT. CT, plain films and barium expose the fetus to radiation or are unhelpful.

Click to reveal answer

Q7 RD7.4 1 pt

A 72-year-old man presents with abdominal distension, absolute constipation and colicky pain. The abdominal X-ray shows peripherally placed dilated loops with haustra that do not cross the full width of the lumen, and the caecum measures 10 cm. Which is the most likely diagnosis?

A Small-bowel obstruction
B Large-bowel obstruction
C Paralytic ileus with normal calibre
D Acute appendicitis
E Normal study

Correct. Peripheral dilated loops with haustra (not crossing the full lumen width) and a caecum greater than 9 cm indicate large-bowel obstruction.

LBO: peripheral loops, haustra not crossing full width, caecum greater than 9 cm. SBO: central loops, valvulae conniventes crossing full width, calibre greater than 3 cm.

Peripheral loops + haustra (partial folds) + caecum greater than 9 cm = large-bowel obstruction. SBO has central loops with valvulae conniventes crossing the full width and calibre greater than 3 cm.

Click to reveal answer

Q8 RD7.4 1 pt

A patient with intestinal obstruction has been confirmed on plain film, but the surgeon wants to identify the level, cause, and whether there is a closed loop or ischaemia. Which single statement is correct?

A Contrast-enhanced CT is the investigation to map the level, cause, closed-loop and ischaemia
B Barium follow-through is preferred even if perforation is possible
C Ultrasound is the definitive investigation for the level of obstruction
D MRI is the first-line emergency investigation for the cause
E No further imaging is needed after the plain film in any case

Correct. After the plain film confirms obstruction, CT is the comprehensive study that maps level and cause and detects closed-loop and ischaemia; barium is avoided when perforation is possible.

Erect/supine AXR first to confirm; CT next to map level, cause, closed-loop and ischaemia. Avoid barium if perforation is possible.

CT is the comprehensive next study for level, cause, closed-loop and ischaemia. Barium is contraindicated when perforation is possible; ultrasound and MRI are not the emergency mapping tools here.

Click to reveal answer