Page 14 of 19

PA18.1-2 | Chronic Leukaemias — CML & CLL — Part 3

CLL: Rai and Binet Staging, and Richter Transformation

⚑ AI image — pending faculty review (auto-QA score 7/10; best of 3 attempts)

Infographic comparing Rai and Binet staging of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and illustrating Richter transformation into aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

CLL Staging and Richter Transformation

Panel A: Rai Stage 0: lymphocytosis only; Stage I: lymphadenopathy; Stage II: splenomegaly/hepatomegaly; Stage III: anaemia, Hb <11 g/dL; Stage IV: thrombocytopenia, platelets <100 x 10^9/L. Panel B: Binet Stage A: fewer than 3 lymphoid areas involved, no anaemia or thrombocytopenia; Stage B: 3 or more lymphoid areas involved, no anaemia or thrombocytopenia; Stage C: anaemia and/or thrombocytopenia regardless of lymphoid areas. Panel C: Richter transformation: CLL clone evolves into aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; sudden rapid lymph node enlargement; markedly elevated LDH; constitutional symptoms; median survival less than 1 year.

Rai Staging (USA):
• Stage 0: Lymphocytosis only
• Stage I: + Lymphadenopathy
• Stage II: + Splenomegaly/hepatomegaly
• Stage III: + Anaemia (Hb <11 g/dL)
• Stage IV: + Thrombocytopenia (platelets <100 × 10⁹/L)

Binet Staging (Europe — simpler for MCQs):
• Stage A: <3 lymphoid areas involved, no anaemia/thrombocytopenia
• Stage B: ≥3 lymphoid areas involved, no anaemia/thrombocytopenia
• Stage C: Anaemia and/or thrombocytopenia (regardless of lymphoid areas)

Prognosis correlates with stage: Stage 0/A → median survival >10 years; Stage III-IV/C → 2-3 years.

Richter transformation: In ~5-10% of CLL cases, the clone transforms into an aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma — DLBCL). This presents as sudden rapid enlargement of a lymph node, markedly elevated LDH, and constitutional symptoms. Prognosis after Richter transformation is very poor (median survival <1 year). It represents clonal evolution — similar in concept to blast crisis in CML.

CML vs CLL: A Direct Comparison

A side-by-side medical diagram compares CML and CLL by cell of origin, age group, mutations, blood film findings, LAP score, splenomegaly, immune dysfunction, and complications.

CML vs CLL: Direct Comparison

Panel A: Hematopoietic stem cell, myeloid stem cell, mature B lymphocyte, CML origin, CLL origin. Panel B: CML blood film with full myeloid spectrum, basophilia, Philadelphia chromosome t(9;22), BCR-ABL1 fusion, low LAP score, massive splenomegaly, blast crisis. Panel C: CLL blood film with mature lymphocytosis, smudge cells, del13q, del17p, TP53 abnormalities, normal LAP score, moderate splenomegaly, hypogammaglobulinaemia, AIHA, recurrent infections, Richter transformation.
FeatureCMLCLL
Cell of originMyeloid stem cellMature B lymphocyte
AgeMiddle-aged (40-60 yr)Elderly (>60 yr)
Key mutationBCR-ABL1 / t(9;22)del13q, del17p, TP53, etc.
Blood filmFull myeloid spectrum + basophiliaMature lymphocytosis + smudge cells
LAP scoreLowNormal
SplenomegalyMassiveModerate
Immune dysfunctionRareCommon (hypogammaglobulinaemia, AIHA)
Key complicationBlast crisis (→ AML/ALL)Richter transformation (→ DLBCL)
Targeted therapyImatinib (TKI)Ibrutinib (BTK inhibitor), venetoclax

For the exam: CML = myeloid + low LAP + BCR-ABL1 + massive spleen. CLL = mature lymphocytes + smudge cells + immune dysfunction + elderly.

Other Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and JAK2 V617F

A four-panel infographic compares PV, ET, and PMF as JAK2 V617F-associated chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms distinct from BCR-ABL1-positive CML.

JAK2 V617F in Non-CML Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Panel A: CMPN pathway showing BCR-ABL1-negative testing, JAK2 V617F gain-of-function, constitutive cytokine-receptor signalling, and contrast with CML = BCR-ABL1 / Philadelphia chromosome. Panel B: Polycythaemia vera showing clonal erythroid proliferation, increased RBC mass, raised Hb, raised haematocrit, hyperviscosity, thrombosis, plethora, headache, and pruritus after hot bath. Panel C: Essential thrombocythaemia showing clonal megakaryocyte proliferation, very high platelet count, thrombosis, bleeding, and platelet dysfunction. Panel D: Primary myelofibrosis showing fibrotic marrow, massive splenomegaly from extramedullary haematopoiesis, nucleated RBCs, immature granulocytes, and teardrop RBCs / dacrocytes.

Beyond CML, three other chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (CMPNs) share the theme of clonal myeloid proliferation but affect different lineages:

Polycythaemia vera (PV): Clonal erythroid (RBC) proliferation. Presents with hyperviscosity symptoms (headache, plethora, thrombosis, pruritus after hot bath). Raised Hb, raised haematocrit, raised RBC mass.

Essential thrombocythaemia (ET): Clonal megakaryocyte/platelet proliferation. Presents with thrombosis and paradoxically also bleeding (platelet dysfunction). Very high platelet count.

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF): Clonal proliferation with reactive fibrosis of the marrow. Presents with massive splenomegaly (extramedullary haematopoiesis), leucoerythroblastic blood picture (nucleated RBCs + immature granulocytes), and teardrop-shaped red cells (dacrocytes).

The unifying molecular lesion in PV (>95%), ET (~60%), and PMF (~60%) is the JAK2 V617F point mutation — a gain-of-function mutation in the Janus kinase 2 signalling protein that mimics constitutive cytokine-receptor stimulation. Testing for JAK2 V617F is the first-line molecular test when a CMPN is suspected and BCR-ABL1 is negative.

Key memory hook: CML = BCR-ABL1 (Ph chromosome). All other CMPNs = JAK2 V617F.

SELF-CHECK

A 65-year-old woman has haematocrit 58%, splenomegaly, and pruritus after a warm bath. BCR-ABL1 PCR is negative. Which molecular test should be ordered next?

A. TP53 sequencing

B. JAK2 V617F mutation analysis

C. FISH for t(15;17) PML-RARA

D. del(13q) by FISH

Reveal Answer

Answer: B. JAK2 V617F mutation analysis

The raised haematocrit, splenomegaly, and aquagenic pruritus strongly suggest polycythaemia vera (PV). PV is BCR-ABL1-negative (ruling out CML). The next step is JAK2 V617F mutation testing, positive in >95% of PV cases. PML-RARA is the APL translocation. del(13q) is associated with CLL and myeloma. TP53 sequencing is relevant in CLL with high-risk features or therapy planning.

CLINICAL PEARL

The aquagenic pruritus of PV — itching triggered specifically by warm water or bathing — is caused by histamine release from the increased mast cells and basophils in the skin. It is one of the most specific symptoms in haematology. If a patient says they itch after a shower but not from dry skin, think polycythaemia vera and check the haematocrit.

Putting It Together: A Diagnostic Framework

A stepwise flowchart shows how leucocytosis is classified by cell lineage, tested with LAP score, BCR-ABL1 and CD markers, staged for prognosis, and linked to targeted therapy.

Diagnostic Framework for Leukocytosis

Panel A: Leucocytosis on blood film; neutrophils/myeloid series; mature lymphocytes; CML; Leukaemoid Reaction; AML; CLL; reactive lymphocytosis; viral infection. Panel B: Low LAP score; CML; BCR-ABL1 confirmation; high LAP score; Leukaemoid Reaction; sepsis; TB; carcinoma; increased blasts; AML. Panel C: Mature lymphocytes; smudge cells; CD5 positive; CD19 positive; CLL; reactive lymphocytes; viral lymphocytosis. Panel D: CML blast percentage ladder; chronic phase; accelerated phase; blast crisis; CLL Rai staging; CLL Binet staging; low-risk; intermediate; high-risk. Panel E: BCR-ABL1 TKI therapy; imatinib first-line; PCR monitoring; CLL watch-and-wait; BTK inhibitor ibrutinib; BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax; symptomatic/high-risk disease.

When you encounter leucocytosis on a blood film, use this stepwise approach:

Step 1 — What type of cells are increased?
• Neutrophils/myeloid series → CML vs Leukaemoid Reaction vs AML
• Mature lymphocytes → CLL vs Reactive lymphocytosis vs Viral infection

Step 2 — Apply the discriminating tests:
• LAP score low → CML (check BCR-ABL1 to confirm)
• LAP score high → Leukaemoid Reaction (find the cause: sepsis, TB, carcinoma)
• Smudge cells + mature lymphocytes + CD5/CD19 co-expression → CLL

Step 3 — Assess phase/stage for prognosis:
• CML: Blast percentage → Chronic / Accelerated / Blast crisis
• CLL: Rai or Binet staging → low-risk / intermediate / high-risk

Step 4 — Targeted therapy:
• CML → BCR-ABL1 TKI (imatinib first-line, monitor by PCR)
• CLL → Watch-and-wait if asymptomatic; BTK inhibitor (ibrutinib) or BCL-2 inhibitor (venetoclax) for symptomatic/high-risk disease